Analysis on Growth Effect and Heritability of Liquidambar Formosana Hance Interplanted in Sparse Stands of Pinus Massoniana
-
摘要: 选择肥沃立地质量Ⅰ类地（LD1）、较肥沃立地质量Ⅱ类地（LD2）和中等肥沃立地质量Ⅲ类地（LD3）等3种立地质量的马尾松稀疏林分开展套种枫香的对比试验，研究枫香在马尾松稀疏林分中套种的生长效果及主要性状遗传力。结果表明：枫香在郁闭度0.3~0.4的马尾松稀疏林套种，其造林成活率和保存率都比较高，生长状况良好；在肥沃、较肥沃立地质量马尾松稀疏林分套种的枫香生长量明显高于中等肥沃立地条件；枫香在肥沃、较肥沃和中等肥沃3种立地质量条件下的马尾松稀疏林分套种树冠性状生长发育较好，其树高、胸径、材积以及尖削度、冠长率、树冠圆满度、冠型指数的遗传力都在0.7以上，遗传稳定性较好。综上表明枫香在马尾松低效林改造和景观提升中是较好的树种之一。Abstract: In order to study the growth effect and heritability of main traits of Liquidambar formosana Hance interplanted in the sparse stands of Pinus massoniana, the comparative experiment was conducted by selecting the sparse stands of Pinus massoniana with three kinds of site qualities, namely fertile (LD1), relatively fertile (LD2) and moderately fertile (LD3). The results showed that Liquidambar formosana Hance interplanted in the sparse stands of Pinus massoniana with the canopy density of 0.3-0.4 had relatively high survival rate of afforestation and the growth conditions were good. The growths of Liquidambar formosana Hance interplanted in the sparse stands of Pinus massoniana with fertile (LD1) and relatively fertile (LD2) site qualities were significantly higher than that with moderately fertile (LD3) site quality. The crown traits of Liquidambar formosana Hance interplanted in the sparse stands of Pinus massoniana under three site quality conditions, namely fertile, relatively fertile and moderately fertile, had good growth and development, whose heritabilities of tree height, DBH, timber volume, taperingness, crown length rate, crown width and crown type index were all above 0.7, with good genetic stability. Above all, it was shown that Liquidambar formosana Hance was one of the better tree species in the reconstruction of low-function forest of Pinus massoniana and landscape improvement.
-
Keywords:
- Pinus massoniana /
- Liquidambar formosana Hance /
- Sparse stand /
- Interplant /
- Growth /
- Heritability
-
-
[1] 中国树木志编委会.中国主要树种造林技术(上册)[M].北京:农业出版社,1976. [2] 秦国峰.马尾松地理种源[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003. [3] 安徽农学院林学系.马尾松[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1982. [4] 陈存及,陈伙法.阔叶树种栽培[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000. [5] 江苏医学院.中药大辞典(第1版)[M].上海:上海出版社,1977. [6] 王发国,叶华谷,叶育石.枫香的育苗栽培技术及其开发[J].经济林研究, 2003,21(4):51-53. [7] 王小彩,蒋爱维,王焕银,等.枫香在景观林建设中的应用探讨[J].科学与技术信息,2010,(23):397,388. [8] 起国海,吴疆翀,郑益兴,等.基于综合评分法的辣木优树选择[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(7):2282-2290. [9] 梁一池.树木育种原理与方法[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,1997:268-273. [10] 唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2002. [11] 俞新妥.混交林营造原理及技术[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1989. [12] 叶晓霞,徐肇友,王帮顺,等.不同枫香种源造林实验及优良种源选择[J].浙江林业科技,2013,33(2):71-74. [13] 郑宝定.不同造林密度杉木枫香混交林生长效果分析[J].江西林业科技,2012(6):3-5. -
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 杨继生，姜英，刘雄盛，黄荣林，刘菲，王勇，王仁杰，李虹瑾. 不同种源枫香种子性状及幼苗生长节律分析. 广西林业科学. 2024(04): 463-468 . 
百度学术
2. 陈风丽. 四种生态景观树种在马尾松疏林地中套种的生长效果分析. 河南林业科技. 2023(04): 28-31 . 百度学术
3. 罗小金. 马尾松丝栗栲异龄复层经营的生长效应分析. 林业勘察设计. 2022(02): 68-70+73 . 百度学术
4. 林家生. 枫香在马尾松稀疏林分下套种的生长效果比较试验. 广东蚕业. 2021(07): 35-36 . 百度学术
5. 李鹏程. 马尾松林下套种米槠的生长效应研究. 林业勘察设计. 2021(04): 49-52 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 406
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 17
- 被引次数: 5
下载:
