玉米秸秆+甘蔗叶梢+木薯渣复合饲料对肉牛生产性能和经济效益的影响

    Effects of Compound Feed of Corn Straw, Sugarcane Leaf Tip and Cassava Residue on the Performance and Economic Benefit of Beef Cattle

    • 摘要: 为明确玉米秸秆+甘蔗叶梢+木薯渣复合饲料对育肥肉牛生长情况和经济效益的影响,分别设鲜甜玉米秸秆(对照组,CK)、试验Ⅰ组(鲜玉米秸秆:鲜甘蔗叶梢:鲜木薯渣为3:1:1)、试验Ⅱ组(鲜玉米秸秆:鲜甘蔗叶梢:鲜木薯渣为2:2:1)、试验Ⅲ组(鲜玉米秸秆:鲜甘蔗叶梢:鲜木薯渣为1:3:1)、试验Ⅳ组(干玉米秸秆:干甘蔗叶梢:干木薯渣为3:1:1)、试验Ⅴ组(干玉米秸秆:干甘蔗叶梢:干木薯渣为2:2:1)、试验Ⅵ组(干玉米秸秆:干甘蔗叶梢:干木薯渣为1:3:1)进行饲养试验。结果显示,肉牛的育肥效果排序为对照组(CK) > 试验Ⅰ组 > 试验Ⅳ组 > 试验Ⅱ组 > 试验Ⅴ组 > 试验Ⅲ组 > 试验Ⅵ组,而毛利润排序为试验Ⅳ组 > 试验Ⅱ组 > 试验Ⅴ组 > 试验Ⅰ组 > 对照组(CK) > 试验Ⅲ组 > 试验Ⅵ组,综合育肥效果及经济效益以试验Ⅳ组(干玉米秸秆:干甘蔗梢:干木薯渣为3:1:1)的效果最佳,其平均日增重为858.97 kg·头-1,毛利润达4 839.12元·头-1,较对照组(CK)显著提高10.83%。

       

      Abstract: In order to clarify the effect of corn straw+sugarcane leaf tip+cassava residue compound feed on the growth and economic benefits of fattening beef cattle, the fresh sweet corn straw (control group, CK), test group Ⅰ (fresh corn straw:fresh sugarcane leaf tip:fresh cassava residue was 3:1:1), test group Ⅱ (fresh corn straw:fresh sugarcane leaf tip:fresh cassava residue was 2:2:1), test group Ⅲ (fresh corn straw:fresh sugarcane leaf tip:fresh cassava residue was 1:3:1), test group Ⅳ (dry corn straw:dry sugarcane leaf tip:dry cassava residue was 3:1:1), test group Ⅴ (dry corn straw:dry sugarcane leaf tip:dry cassava residue was 2:2:1), test group Ⅵ (dry corn straw:dry sugarcane leaf tip:dry cassava residue was 1:3:1) were respectively set up to carry out the feeding experiment. The results showed that the order of fattening effect of beef cattle was control group (CK) > test group I > test group Ⅳ > test group Ⅱ > test group Ⅴ > test group Ⅲ > test group Ⅵ, while the order of gross profit was test group Ⅳ > test group Ⅱ > test group Ⅴ > test group Ⅰ > control group (CK) > test group III > test group Ⅵ. The comprehensive fattening effect and economic benefit were obtained in test group Ⅳ (dry corn straw:dry sugarcane leaf tip:dry cassava residue was 3:1:1). The average daily gain was 858.97 kg per head, and the gross profit was 4 839.12 yuan per head, which was significantly increased by 10.83% compared with the control group (CK).

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回