Impact of Controlled Atmosphere Mellowing Storage Method Under Different Oxygen Concentrations on the Quality Preservation Effect of Flue-cured Tobacco Strips
-
摘要: 采用烟叶气调醇化贮存方法，设置3种不同氧气浓度（≤ 2%、2%~4%、9%~11%）贮存6种达到适宜使用期的片烟，比较分析不同氧气浓度下气调醇化方法对片烟外观和感官质量的影响。结果表明：片烟采用3种不同氧气浓度气调醇化贮存的保质效果均优于常规自然醇化贮存，能够有效地延缓片烟质量下降速度，延长片烟贮存和使用时间。其中，以采用≤ 2%氧气浓度气调醇化贮存方法的片烟保质效果最好，其质量水平下降最缓慢，质量保持时间最长，云南马龙B2F-2010、云南马龙C3F-2010、云南马龙X2F-2010、阿根廷B1O-2010、福建尤溪C3F-2010和贵州务川C3F-2010等片烟在≤ 2%氧气浓度下气调醇化贮存20个月后外观质量分别下降14.14%、12.39%、4.68%、13.27%、12.13%和8.89%，感官质量分别下降8.02%、5.17%、12.54%、5.16%、6.38%和8.38%。Abstract: By adopting the controlled atmosphere (CA) mellowing storage method of tobacco leaves, three different oxygen concentrations (≤ 2%, 2%-4%, 9%-11%) were set up to store 6 kinds of tobacco strips that reached the suitable period of use, and the effects of CA mellowing storage method at different oxygen concentrations on the appearance and sensory quality of tobacco strips were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the quality preservation effects of tobacco strips stored by the CA mellowing method with three different oxygen concentrations were better than that stored by the conventional natural mellowing method, which could effectively delay the decline rate of tobacco quality and prolong the storage and use time of tobacco strips. Among them, the tobacco strips stored by the CA mellowing method with less than 2% oxygen concentration had the best quality preservation effect, of which the quality level declined the most slowly and the quality maintained the longest. After 20 months of CA mellowing storage with less than 2% oxygen concentration, the appearance quality of tobacco strips such as Yunnang Malong B2F-2010, Yunnang Malong C3F-2010, Yunnang Malong X2F-2010, Argentina B1O-2010, Fujian Youxi C3F-2010 and Guizhou Wuchuan C3F-2010 decreased by 14.14%, 12.39%, 4.68%, 13.27%, 12.13% and 8.89%, respectively, and the sensory quality of them decreased by 8.02%, 5.17%, 12.54%, 5.16%, 6.38% and 8.38%, respectively.
-
-
[1] 颜克亮,武怡,曾晓鹰,等.基于提质减害的烟叶醇化技术研究进展[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(3):450-453. [2] 黄立兵,曾经纬,吴让新,等.气氛调控养护对片烟醇化质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2017,45(3):86-89. [3] 赖成连, 张增基, 赖荣华,等.仓储方式对初烤烟叶质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2008(11):59-62. [4] 刘博,于录.快速降氧在片烟原料杀虫中的应用研究[J].现代农业科技,2012(22):122. [5] 杨庆,常勇,王文,等. 烟叶物理气调法密封降氧工艺研究[J]. 中国烟草科学,2013,34(3):79-83. [6] 卓思楚.烟叶气调剂不同氧气浓度的防霉杀虫及醇化效果[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(1):158-160. [7] 范坚强,宋纪真,赖成连,等.密封降氧抑制醇化过程中烟片颜色转深试验[J].烟草科技,2005(12):3-5. [8] 卓思楚.福建翠碧1号片烟不同环境醇化质量对比分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(3):308-314. [9] 王能如,李章海,周惠玲,等.三明与遵义烤烟陈化前期化学特性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(20):8633-8635. [10] 董美.福建烤烟陈化过程影响烟叶褐变的相关因素分析[D].福州:福建农林大学,2010. [11] 宋纪真,张增基,陈永龙,等.贮存条件对烤烟片烟醇化质量的影响[J].烟草科技,2003(9):6-8. [12] 陈万年,宋纪真,范坚强,等.福建和云南烤烟烟片的最佳醇化期及适宜贮存时间[J]. 烟草科技,2003(7):9-12. [13] 杨欣玲,杨永锋,张俊岭,等.气调贮存技术对片烟醇化质量的影响[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(10):153-159. [14] 国家烟草专卖局,全国烟草标准化技术委员会.烟草技术标准汇编(七)[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2003. [15] 张恩仁.不同内衬袋对片烟醇化质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(30):14689-14690. [16] 宋纪真,陈永龙,张增基,等.包装材料对烤烟叶片自然醇化的影响[J].烟草科技,2003(5):10-13. [17] 孙建峰.不同醇化方法和储存条件对片烟醇化的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2017,41(28):11491-11493. -
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 贾桥东，项波卡，金光辉，严航，张?，刘亮. 片烟不同充氮时间和复氧过程的醇化品质对比. 中南农业科技. 2024(05): 18-21+28 . 
百度学术
2. 陈斌，徐玮杰，李强，汤朝起，张鑫，黄慧，孙亚庆，杨凯. 气调技术在我国烟叶仓储养护上的研究与应用进展. 中国烟草科学. 2024(03): 113-120 . 百度学术
3. 贾桥东，项波，张文敏，胡伟昭，郭学卫，尹鹏. 充氮气调与通风复氧技术在片烟贮存养护中的应用. 中国新技术新产品. 2023(23): 50-53 . 百度学术
4. 黄磊，战磊，陈越立，李杨，高群玉，黄宙凯，高晋军，阳小栋，谢晋，黄浩，李敏. 充氮气调时不同氧浓度醇化对片烟品质和化学成分的影响. 贵州农业科学. 2022(01): 104-111 . 百度学术
5. 郑好，赵宝良，李京京，邓丹，李雅雯，方玉强. 不同氧气浓度对烟叶醇化质量的影响. 湖北农业科学. 2022(23): 145-149 . 百度学术
6. 谢丽萍，刘景川，乐承星，沈禄恒，赖兰凤. 片烟气调贮存开垛回盖方式的防虫效果研究. 现代农业科技. 2021(09): 247-248+250 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 371
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 22
- 被引次数: 6
下载:
