环境扫描电镜在水稻二化螟幼虫(Chilo suppressalis)分龄中的应用

    The application of ESEM in distinguishing different instars of rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis

    • 摘要: 二化螟是水稻上的重要害虫之一,近年来在我国部分地区为害逐渐加重。由于二化螟的幼虫分龄存在一定的难度,而且缺少科学的分龄标准。为此需要对水稻二化螟幼虫的分龄标准进一步进行研究,以便为二化螟的预测预报和防治提供科学依据。试验虫源来自室内稻苗饲养的二化螟种群,二化螟越冬幼虫采自稻田稻桩,利用环境扫描电镜(ESEM)技术,系统研究水稻二化螟幼虫的腹足趾钩数和头宽在不同龄期二化螟幼虫之间的变化特征,为制定科学的分龄标准提供依据。结果表明:水稻二化螟1~6龄幼虫的腹足趾钩数平均分别为6.2、13.0、18.4、30.0、41.0和49.2个;而越冬幼虫腹足趾钩数平均为41.0个。同时,水稻二化螟随着幼虫龄期的增加腹足趾钩数显著增多,各龄幼虫腹足趾钩数的差异性显著,但越冬幼虫的腹足趾钩数与5龄幼虫腹足趾钩数差异不显著。水稻二化螟幼虫1~6龄幼虫的头壳宽度随着虫龄的增大而加宽,平均头宽分别为0.25、0.45、0.68、0.98、1.15 和1.31 mm,越冬幼虫头壳宽度平均为1.44 mm,各龄幼虫头宽有显著差异,并且水稻二化螟越冬幼虫的头宽长度最长。利用二化螟的腹足趾钩数和头宽可以准确的将二化螟各个龄期和越冬幼虫加以区分;同时,也明确了基于腹足趾钩数和头宽的二化螟不同龄期幼虫和越冬幼虫的分类标准。

       

      Abstract: Chilo suppressalis(Walker)is is one of main pests of rice, and recently its harm to rice is increasingly serious in parts of China. C. suppressalis is difficult to classify its larval instar, and the scientific standard for instar classification is lack. Therefore, it’s necessary to further clarify instars classification standard of C. suppressalis larvae, and to provide a scientific basis for the prediction and control of C. suppressalis. The experiment insect source was got from the the larvae population of C. suppressalis raised by rice seedlings, and the overwintering larvae of C. suppressalis were collected from rice piles in fields.Using Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope(ESEM)techniques, the varied characteristics of number of crochets on prolegs and head width of C. suppressalis larvae was studied systematically to develop a scientific the standard of discriminative of diferent instar larvae. The average number of crochets on prolegs of C. suppressalis larvae from the 1st to 6th instars was 6.2, 13.0, 18.4, 30.0, 41.0 and 49.2 respectively, while the average number of crochets on prolegs of the overwintering larvae was 41.0. At the same time, the number of crochets on prolegs of C. suppressalis larvae increased significantly with the elder instar. And there were significant differences in the number of crochets on prolegs among different instar larvae. But the number of crochets on prolegs of overwintering larvae was not significantly different from that of the 5th instar larvae. The head width of C. suppressalis larvae(1st-6th instar)was broadened as the instar of the larva increased, which was 0.25 mm, 0.45 mm, 0.68 mm, 0.98 mm, 1.15 mm and 1.31 mm respectively, while the head width of overwintering larvaewas 1.44 mm. The head widths of different instar C. suppressalis larvae were different significantly, and the overwintering larvae of C. suppressalis had the longest head width. The number of crochets on prolegs and head width of the C. suppressalis larvae can accurately distinguish different instar laraveand overwintering larvae of C. suppressalis. Moreover, this study also indicates the the classification criteria for different instar and overwintering larvae of C. suppressalis, according to the number of crochets on prolegs and head width.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回