李海明, 李和平, 张树河. 果蔗品种比较试验初报[J]. 福建农业科技, 2017, 48(2): 3-4. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2017.02.002
    引用本文: 李海明, 李和平, 张树河. 果蔗品种比较试验初报[J]. 福建农业科技, 2017, 48(2): 3-4. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2017.02.002
    LI Hai-ming, LI He-ping, ZHANG Shu-he. A preliminary report on comparison test of fruit cane variety[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 48(2): 3-4. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2017.02.002
    Citation: LI Hai-ming, LI He-ping, ZHANG Shu-he. A preliminary report on comparison test of fruit cane variety[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 48(2): 3-4. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2017.02.002

    果蔗品种比较试验初报

    A preliminary report on comparison test of fruit cane variety

    • 摘要: 以闽引黄皮果蔗、龙黑果蔗为试验材料,黑皮果蔗和大田雪蔗为对照品种,在三明市大田县进行品种比较试验,结果表明:闽引黄皮果蔗、龙黑果蔗均表现较好的综合性状,适应性强;闽引黄皮果蔗每667 m2产量9715 kg,与对照大田雪蔗相当,比对照黑皮果蔗增产达极显著水平;龙黑果蔗蔗糖分含量15.90%,比两对照增糖效果达极显著水平;试验期间,闽引黄皮果蔗、龙黑果蔗均未发现病虫害发生。闽引黄皮果蔗综合表现更好,可进一步推广种植;龙黑果蔗可进一步试验。

       

      Abstract: A variety comparison test were carried out in Datian County,Sanming City by using fruit cane cv.‘Minyinhuangpi’ and‘Longhei’ as trial materials and‘Heipi’ and‘Datianxuezhe’ as control.The results showed that‘Minyinhuangpi’ and‘Longhei’showed good comprehensive characters and high adaptability.The yield of‘Minyinhuangpi’ was 9715 kg per 667 m2,was similar to that of‘Datianxuezhe’ and was very significantly higher than that of‘Heipi’.Sucrose content of‘Longhei’ was 15.90% and was very significantly higher than that of‘Heipi’ and‘Datianxuezhe’ as control.‘Minyinhuangpi’ and‘Longhei’ showed no occurrence of diseases and pests during test.‘Minyinhuangpi’ had better comprehensive characters and could be further popularized.But‘Longhei’ needs to be made further trial.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回