林秀美. 2021年福建省夏大豆新品种区域试验分析与评价(漳平市试验点)[J]. 福建农业科技, 2022, 53(5): 33-38. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2022.05.006
    引用本文: 林秀美. 2021年福建省夏大豆新品种区域试验分析与评价(漳平市试验点)[J]. 福建农业科技, 2022, 53(5): 33-38. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2022.05.006
    LIN Xiu-mei. Analysis and Evaluation on the Regional Test of New Summer Soybean Varieties in Fujian Province in 2021 (Zhangping Experimental Site)[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 53(5): 33-38. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2022.05.006
    Citation: LIN Xiu-mei. Analysis and Evaluation on the Regional Test of New Summer Soybean Varieties in Fujian Province in 2021 (Zhangping Experimental Site)[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 53(5): 33-38. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2022.05.006

    2021年福建省夏大豆新品种区域试验分析与评价(漳平市试验点)

    Analysis and Evaluation on the Regional Test of New Summer Soybean Varieties in Fujian Province in 2021 (Zhangping Experimental Site)

    • 摘要: 福建省漳平市良种繁育场承担了2021年福建省夏大豆新品种区域试验,参试品种12个,以绿斜为对照。通过对夏大豆参试品种的农艺性状、丰产性、抗逆性和适应性等进行综合比较,结果表明:华夏26号、福夏豆5号、南农99-6比对照绿斜增产,泉豆24和福夏豆4号比对照绿斜减产,且减产达极显著水平;华夏26号和福夏豆5号植株性状综合表现较好,商品性较好,抗逆性强,适应性广;南农99-6和福夏豆1号生育期适中,表现为主茎结荚,适合密植,具有增产潜力,抗逆性好;华夏18号、泉豆23、福农6号、福农5号、南农201植株性状综合表现正常,泉豆24和福夏豆4号植株性状综合表现一般。根据抗炭疽病接菌鉴定结果,南农99-6、福夏豆1号和福夏豆5号为抗病(R)品种,泉豆24为高感(HS)品种,南农201为感病(S)品种,福夏豆4号为中感(MS)品种。因此,经综合比较分析,建议南农99-6和福夏豆1号下一年进入生产试验;华夏26号和福夏豆5号下一年继续参加区域试验;华夏18号、泉豆23、福农6号、福农5号、南农201下一年可继续观察种植;泉豆24和福夏豆4号终止试验。

       

      Abstract: The regional test of new summer soybean varieties in Fujian in 2021 was carried out in the breeding field for fine varieties in Zhangping City. There were 12 tested varieties and Lvxie was used as the control group. And the agronomic characters, high yield, stress resistance and adaptability of the tested summer soybean varieties were comprehensively compared. The results showed that the yields of Huaxia No.26, Fuxiadou No.5 and Nannong 99-6 were higher than that of the control group Lvxie, while the yields of Quandou 24 and Fuxiadou No.4 were lower than that of the control group Lvxie, and the yield reduction reached the extremely significant level. Huaxia No.26 and Fuxiadou No.5 had good comprehensive performance, good commodity, strong resistance and wide adaptability. Nannong 99-6 and Fuxiadou No.1 had moderate growth period, and the main stems were pod-setting, which were suitable for close planting, with the potential for increasing yield and good resistance to stress. The plant traits of Huaxia No.18, Quandou 23, Funong No.6, Funong No.5 and Nannong 201 showed normal comprehensive performance, while the plant traits of Quandou 24 and Fuxiadou No.4 showed general comprehensive performance. According to the identification result of the resistance to anthracnose of the tested varieties, Nannong 99-6, Fuxiadou No.1 and Fuxiadou No.5 were disease-resistant (R) varieties, Quantou 24 was highly susceptible (HS) variety, Nannong 201 was susceptible (S) variety, and Fuxiadou No.4 was moderate susceptible (MS) variety. Therefore, after the comprehensive comparative analysis, it was suggested that Nannong 99-6 and Fuxiadou No.1 should be put into the production test next year. Huaxia No.26 and Fuxiadou No.5 would continue to participate in the regional trials next year. Huaxia No.18, Quandou 23, Funong No.6, Funong No.5 and Nannong 201 could continue to be observed and planted next year, while the test on Quantou 24 and Fuxiadou No.4 should be terminated.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回