邱宇. 福建省乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平测度与分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2023, 54(5): 77-82. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2023.05.013
    引用本文: 邱宇. 福建省乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平测度与分析[J]. 福建农业科技, 2023, 54(5): 77-82. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2023.05.013
    QIU Yu. Measurement and Analysis of the Performance Level of Promoting Rural Revitalization Strategies in Fujian Province[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 54(5): 77-82. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2023.05.013
    Citation: QIU Yu. Measurement and Analysis of the Performance Level of Promoting Rural Revitalization Strategies in Fujian Province[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 54(5): 77-82. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2023.05.013

    福建省乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平测度与分析

    Measurement and Analysis of the Performance Level of Promoting Rural Revitalization Strategies in Fujian Province

    • 摘要: 从产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕5个方面构建指标体系,通过熵权法确定各指标权重,并采用TOPSIS模型对福建省9个地市2016-2021年乡村振兴战略推进绩效进行评估。结果表明:福州、厦门、三明乡村振兴战略推进绩效优秀;泉州、南平、漳州、莆田推进乡村振兴战略绩效水平良好;龙岩、宁德综合得分指数排名靠后,乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平一般。

       

      Abstract: The index system was constructed from the five aspects, including the industrial prosperity, ecological livability, rural civilization, effective governance and rich life. The weight of each index was determined by using the entropy weight method, and the TOPSIS model was used to evaluate the performance of promoting the rural revitalization strategy in the nine cities of Fujian Province from 2016 to 2021. The results showed that the rural revitalization strategies which were promoted in Fuzhou, Xiamen and Sanming have achieved excellent performance. Quanzhou, Nanping, Zhangzhou and Putian had good performance level in promoting the strategy of rural revitalization. Longyan and Ningde ranked low in the comprehensive score index, and the performance level of promoting the rural revitalization strategy was general.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回