WU Mu-lan, ZHANG Jia-hui, LIN Qi-fang, ZHUANG Jie, ZHONG Lin-shan, WEI Xin-yu. Effects of drying methods on active components, antioxidant properties and volatile Flavor Profiles of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2025.09.003
    Citation: WU Mu-lan, ZHANG Jia-hui, LIN Qi-fang, ZHUANG Jie, ZHONG Lin-shan, WEI Xin-yu. Effects of drying methods on active components, antioxidant properties and volatile Flavor Profiles of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2025.09.003

    Effects of drying methods on active components, antioxidant properties and volatile Flavor Profiles of Chrysanthemum morifolium

    • As a traditional medicinal and edible dual-use resource, the drying process of Chrysanthemum morifolium directly affects the retention of active ingredients and product quality. This study compared the effects of six drying methods, including steam de-enzyming and hot air drying(50℃), steam de-enzyming and drying in the shade, steam de-enzyming and freeze-drying, hot air drying, drying in the shade, and freeze-drying, on the color, active ingredients(total phenols, total flavonoids), antioxidant capacity(DPPH, FRAP, ABTS), and volatile flavor of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Key results are as follows: The combination of E-nose and principal component analysis(PCA)showed that the shade drying group exhibited significantly higher comprehensive response values for volatile compounds compared to the other groups(P<0.05), while the volatile components were significantly lost in the steam de-enzyming and hot air drying as well as freeze-drying groups due to high temperature or vacuum environment. The shade drying and freeze-drying treatments yielded the highest total flavonoid contents(86.46 and 84.37 mg·g−1)significantly better than that in the steam de-enzyming and hot air drying group(46.19 mg·g−1)(P<0.05). The steam de-enzyming pretreatment significantly reduced the flavonoid retention rate, with an average loss rate of 26.3%. Antioxidant activity results were showed methods dependence, with the shade dried and hot air dried samples showing the best DPPH(213.81 and 212.10 μmol·g−1)and ABTS(84.44 and 82.83 μmol·g−1)radical scavenging ability, while the FRAP reducing ability was highest in the hot air dried group(356.02 μmol·g−1). It is suggested that drying in the shade or freeze-drying should be prioritized for functional products, while industrial production can consider multi-stage hot air drying to balance quality and efficiency.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return