Citation: | SHEN Qiu-hong, HE Shi-yang, XU Yuan-ke, WU Xia-hua, ZHOU Yi-zhi, WU Jia-sen, YE Li-min. Analysis of Dynamic Changes of Litter and Soil Water Conservation Capacity in Chinese Fir Forest by Thinning[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 55(2): 10-15. DOI: 10.13651/j.cnki.fjnykj.2024.02.002 |
This study aimed to explore the effects of thinning years on the water holding capacity of litter layer and soil layer in Chinese fir forest, thus to provide a scientific basis for evaluating the response of water conservation function of Chinese fir forest to thinning. In Jingning County, southwest Zhejiang Province, the Chinese fir forest with thinning for 1 year, 3 years, 8 years and unthinning was selected as the research object, and the litter and soil samples were collected. Then, the moisture content, water holding capacity, soil bulk density, non-capillary porosity of litter were analyzed and measured, and the relevant indexes were calculated. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the litter stock on hand of Chinese fir forest among different thinning years (P>0.05). The relationship between litter water holding capacity, water holding rate and water immersion time was in accordance with logarithmic function and power function, respectively. The maximum water holding capacity, maximum retention rate and effective retention rate of litter layer in Chinese fir forest with thinning for 8 years were significantly higher than those in the unthinned forest (P<0.05). The maximum water holding capacity and effective retention rate of litter layer in Chinese fir forest with thinning for 3 years and 8 years were significantly higher than those in unthinned forest (P<0.05). After thinning for 8 years, the soil bulk density of 0-10 cm soil layer in Chinese fir forest was significantly decreased (P<0.05), the non-capillary porosity was significantly increased, and the non-capillary water holding capacity was significantly increased by 22.4% (P<0.05). However, there was no significant effect on the related indicators of soil water storage performance in 10-30 cm soil layer (P>0.05). In conclusion, the water conservation function of litter layer and soil layer in Chinese fir forest was enhanced with the extension of thinning years.
[1] |
孙欧文,蔡建国,吴家森,等. 浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J]. 水土保持研究,2019,26(1):118−123.
|
[2] |
邱艳红. 森林培育过程中森林抚育间伐措施分析[J]. 农业开发与装备,2020(1):78,80.
|
[3] |
高荣,成向荣. 间伐对杉木人工林林下植物多样性及其水源涵养能力研究[J]. 绿色科技,2022,24(8):7−11,62.
|
[4] |
郭昊澜,赵子豪,连晓倩,等. 间伐对杉木人工林水土保持功能影响的研究进展[J]. 亚热带农业研究,2021,17(4):252−257.
|
[5] |
范福金. 不同间伐保留密度对杉木人工林凋落量和含水率的影响[J]. 河南农业,2023(29):40−42.
|
[6] |
肖文娅,刁娇娇,费菲,等. 不同强度间伐对杉木人工林凋落物分解速率的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2016,25(8):1291−1299.
|
[7] |
简永旗,吴家森,盛卫星,等. 间伐和林分类型对森林凋落物储量和土壤持水性能的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2021,38(2):320−328.
|
[8] |
陈家琛,蒋政,伍雄辉,等. 间伐对福建山区杉木人工林凋落物水文特征的影响[J/OL]. 生态学杂志,2023:https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/detail/21.1148.Q.20230612.1337.004.html.
|
[9] |
柳思勉,田大伦,项文化,等. 间伐强度对人工杉木林地表径流的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(17):5769−5775.
|
[10] |
周全,王瑞辉,钟呈,等. 抚育间伐对不同龄林杉木人工林土壤理化性质和固土保水的影响研究[J]. 林业资源管理,2018(4):47−54.
|
[11] |
岳超,杨俊杰,喻剑波,等. 抚育间伐对杉木近熟林生长和土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 湖南林业科技,2021,48(4):18−24.
|
[12] |
叶丽敏,许元科,余丽慧,等. 景宁畲族自治县公益林生态监测定位站建设[J]. 福建林业科技,2022,49(4):107−112.
|
[13] |
叶晶,吴家森,张金池,等. 不同经营年限山核桃林地枯落物和土壤的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报,2014,34(3):87−91.
|
[14] |
蒋仲龙,叶柳欣,刘军,等. 封育年限对毛竹林凋落物和土壤持水效能的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2020,37(5):860−866.
|
[15] |
赵磊,王兵,蔡体久,等. 江西大岗山不同密度杉木林枯落物持水与土壤贮水能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(1):203−208,246.
|
[16] |
陈涵,郭弘婷,陈睿,等. 杉木人工林林下植物多样性及其环境对不同间伐强度的短期响应[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(24):10274−10284.
|
[17] |
邹奕巧,孙欧文,刘海英,等. 浙江省天台县不同森林类型枯落物及土壤水文特性[J]. 水土保持通报,2020,40(3):170−174.
|
[18] |
廖文海,曾春兴,孙欧文,等. 浙江省江山市不同森林类型枯落物持水性能[J]. 浙江林业科技,2019,39(6):63−68.
|
[19] |
孙浩,刘晓勇,何齐发,等. 修河上游流域4种森林类型的水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持研究,2017,24(4):337−341,348.
|
[20] |
魏文俊,尤文忠,赵刚,等. 退化柞蚕林封育对枯落物和表层土壤持水效能的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(3):721−728.
|